“告诉我你吃了什么,我会告诉你你的样子。”路德维希·费尔巴哈:“人就是他吃的东西。”伊曼纽尔康德:“关于这个令人愉快的人,每个人都承认他的判断,他以私人的感觉为基础,并宣称一件物品让他高兴,仅限于他个人。因此他不会接受这个问题。当他说金丝雀酒是和蔼可亲的时候,另一个人纠正了这个表达,并提醒他应该说:“这对我来说很愉快”[…]因此,这个公理是正确的:每个人都有自己的品味(感觉上的。)美丽站在一个完全不同的立足点。“柏拉图:“苏格拉底:你认为哲学家应该关心快乐 – 如果他们被称为快乐 – 吃喝吗? – 当然不是,西米亚斯回答说。”你怎么说爱的乐趣 – 他应该关心他们吗? – 绝不是 – 他会不会想到放纵身体的其他方式 – 例如,购买昂贵的衣服,凉鞋,或其他身体装饰品?[…]做什么你说? – 我应该说真正的哲学家会鄙视他们。“路德维希·费尔巴哈(Ludwig Feuerbach):“这项工作虽然只涉及饮食,但在我们的超自然模拟文化中被认为是最低级的行为,具有最大的哲学意义和重要性……以前的哲学家如何打破了他们的头脑身体和灵魂之间的联系问题!现在我们知道,从科学的角度来看,群众从长期经验中知道的是,吃喝都是身体和灵魂的结合,寻找的纽带是营养。 Emmanuel Levinas:“我们当然不是为了吃东西而生活,但是说我们为了生活而吃饭是不正确的;因为我们饿了所以我们吃饭。欲望背后没有进一步的意图……它是好的将。”黑格尔:“因此,艺术的感性方面只与视觉和听觉的两种理论感觉有关,而嗅觉,味觉和触觉仍被排除在外。”弗吉尼亚伍尔夫:“如果一个人吃得不好,就不能好好思考,爱好,睡得好。”圣雄甘地:“世界上有些人如此饥饿,上帝不能以面包的形式出现在他们面前。”乔治萧伯纳:“除了对食物的热爱,没有爱。” Wendell Berry:“充分享受快乐 – 快乐,也就是说,不依赖于无知 – 也许是我们与世界联系的最深刻的实现。在这种乐趣中,我们体验到了我们的依赖和感激,因为我们生活在一个谜,来自我们没有做过的生物和我们无法理解的力量。“ Alain de Botton:“强迫人们一起吃饭是促进耐受的有效方法。”

加拿大阿尔伯塔大学文化Essay代写:路德维希·费尔巴哈

“Tell me what you ate, I will tell you how you look.” Ludwig Feuerbach: “Man is what he eats.” Emanuel Kant: “About this delightful person Everyone admits his judgment. He is based on a private feeling and claims that an item makes him happy and is limited to him personally. Therefore he will not accept this question. When he said that the canary wine is amiable Another person corrected the expression and reminded him that he should say: “This is very pleasant for me” […] Therefore, this axiom is correct: everyone has their own taste (feeling.) Beauty stands on a completely different foothold. “Plato: “Socrates: Do you think philosophers should care about happiness – if they are called happy – eat and drink? – Of course not, Simias replied.” How do you? Say the joy of love – should he care about them? – Never – Does he think of other ways to indulge the body – for example, buying expensive clothes, sandals, or other body decorations? […] What do you say? – I should say that true philosophers will despise them. “Ludwig Feuerbach: “This work, although it only involves diet, is considered to be the lowest level of behavior in our supernatural simulation culture, with the greatest philosophical significance and importance. …. How did previous philosophers break the connection between their minds and souls! Now we know that from a scientific point of view, what the masses know from long-term experience is that eating and drinking is a combination of body and soul, and the bond of seeking is nutrition. Emmanuel Levinas: “Of course we don’t live to eat, but it is not true that we eat for life; because we are hungry, we eat. There is no further intention behind the desire… it is good Hegel: “Therefore, the perceptual aspect of art is only related to the two theoretical feelings of sight and hearing, and the sense of smell, taste and touch are still excluded.” Virginia Woolf: “If a person does not eat well.” You can’t think hard, love, sleep well.” Mahatma Gandhi: “Some people in the world are so hungry that God can’t appear in front of them in the form of bread.” George Bernard Shaw: “Besides the love of food, there is no love.” Wendell Berry: “Enjoy happiness – happiness, that is, not relying on ignorance – may be the most profound realization of our connection with the world. In this kind of fun, we experienced our dependence and gratitude because we live In a mystery, from creatures we haven’t done and power we can’t understand.” Alain de Botton: “Forcing people to eat together An effective way to promote tolerance. “

发表评论

电子邮件地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注