Sure enough, there is a lot of evidence to support the authenticity of the relativistic attitude in various situations. Cultural relativism, religious relativism, linguistic relativism, scientific relativism, and relativism shift from different historical perspectives or various social positions: this is just the beginning of a series of sources that inspires the authenticity of the contrasting views of specific subjects on the subject. . However, in some cases, one might want to resist the idea that relativistic positions are the best theoretical choice: in some cases, it seems that one of the comparative views should be more correct than others. Based on what reason can such a claim be made? The first foundation against which relativistic attitudes can resist is truth. If you accept relativism, you seem to destroy this position immediately when you hold a position. For example, suppose you claim that abortion is never recognized, and that this judgment is related to your growth; don’t you immediately admit that abortion may be reasonably recognized by those with different growth experiences? Therefore, it seems that the relativists are committed to declaring the authenticity of X, while immediately insisting that X may not be true from a different perspective. This seems to be a complete contradiction. The second point highlighted is the ubiquitous characteristics of different cultures. The idea of one person, beauty, kindness, family or private property does vary; but if we look close enough, we can also find common features. It is almost indisputable that people can adjust their cultural development according to their living environment. No matter who your parents are, if you grow up with one or more native speakers, you can learn English or Tagalog equally. Other languages; characteristics of manual or physical skills, such as cooking or dancing, are equally applicable. Even when it comes to perception, it is easy to see that there is a consensus between different cultures. No matter what your culture is, a strong earthquake or a fierce tsunami can cause your fears; no matter your social growth, you will be touched by the beauty of the Grand Canyon. Similar considerations include the brightness of the noon sun or the discomfort caused by a room at 150 degrees Fahrenheit. Although different people have different experiences on the nuances of perception, it seems that there is also a common common core, on the basis of which a non-relativistic perceptual description can be established. Perceptual content also applies to the meaning of our language, which is studied by the branch of semantic philosophy, which is carried out in the name of semantics. When I say “spicy”, I may not exactly mean what you mean; at the same time, if communication is completely effective, it seems that there must be some overlap in meaning. Therefore, the meaning of my words cannot be completely relative to my own views and experiences, but to the pain of impossible communication.